European Affairs
c/o The European Institute
1001 Connecticut Avenue
NW, Suite 220
Washington, DC
20036-5531
Tel: (202) 895-1670
Fax (202) 362-1088
info@europeanaffairs.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
War for Wealth: We Global Grab for Power and Prosperity is a best-seller in Germany that
has reportedly caught the attention of Chancellor Angela Merkel. The author, Gabor Steingart,
44, heads the Berlin office of the German news weekly, Der Spiegel and ranks among
Germany’s top economic writers. SPIEGEL ONLINE is publishing a series of excerpts from
the book in English, from which this selection is taken with the publisher’s permission.
The role NATO played in an age of military threat could be played by a Transatlantic
free-trade zone in today’s age of economic confrontation. The two economic zones – the
European Union and the United States (perhaps with the addition of Canada) – could
stem the dwindling of Western market power by joining forces. Together the Europeans
and the Americans are still a force to be reckoned with. Representing about 13 percent of
the total world population and 60 percent of today’s global economic power, they stand
ready to act as producers and consumers not only of goods, but also of values.
There are three reasons the idea is particularly attractive, and the first is political. Such
cooperation would lead Americans and Europeans closer together again. The temptation to
childishly score points off each other – dangerous in light of the Asian challenge – would be
removed. And while there may be plenty of reasons to oppose U.S. President George W.
Bush, there are few reasons to be against America. From an economic point of view, there are
many tangible reasons that it makes sense to work together with the West’s leading power.
The military alliance which was forged in the Cold War could be carried over into the
global economic war. The aim of maintaining freedom and increasing prosperity would
remain – only the methods of pursuing those aims would change. A free-trade zone
would inevitably lead to a convergence of the two economic systems. Europe would become
more Americanized and the U.S. would become more European, albeit slowly in a
process which would last decades.
Countries that remove all trade barriers and unify accounting standards, technical
norms, copyright laws and stock market practices would also ensure that their financial,
social, taxation and environmental policies didn’t drift apart. Governments would have
more room to maneuver, as well as greater opportunities and responsibilities.
The second major advantage is economic. A domestic market as reliable and as big as
an EU-U.S. free-trade zone would be advantageous for both investors and workers. Economic
growth would be fuelled, though perhaps not drastically. But investment creates
jobs. The West could at least win back part of what it has lost. For one thing, it would regain
the power to set technical standards – even if that does mean, in the global economy
that is more a question of promoting standards than actually “setting” them.
The most imposing effect of such a mega-merger of markets would doubtlessly be felt
in the Far East. the boom region of the last decade and a half would rightly sit up and
take notice. the new message would be this: the price of a product is still important, but
the way in which it has been produced is equally relevant. Countries that refuse to tolerate
trade unions – or which exploit women, children and the environment, to name just a few
issues – would no longer be spoiled by preferential treatment at customs.
~
When (Chancellor Angela) Merkel talks about a free-trade zone though, she isn’t
thinking exclusively about economics. It’s true that the most transparent benefits for companies
of lifting customs barriers and abolishing bureaucracy are most easily measured in
dollars and cents. But there is another invisible advantage – one that influences the landscape
of power even if it doesn’t appear anywhere on the ledgers. Merkel speaks of “nonmaterial
values” that could be preserved and indeed strengthened by the free-trade zone.
For years and years, fear of globalization has preoccupied governments at the cabinet level
in virtually all Western capitals – and an alliance of the democracies and market
economies surrounding the North Atlantic could do everyone there tremendous good. It
would also re-energize the West.
|
|
|
|
